Moral Principles: Bloomsbury Ethics
Autor Dr Maike Albertzarten Limba Engleză Paperback – 22 oct 2014
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 178.51 lei 3-5 săpt. | |
Bloomsbury Publishing – 22 oct 2014 | 178.51 lei 3-5 săpt. | |
Hardback (1) | 564.73 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
Bloomsbury Publishing – 22 oct 2014 | 564.73 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 178.51 lei
Preț vechi: 208.07 lei
-14% Nou
Puncte Express: 268
Preț estimativ în valută:
34.16€ • 35.93$ • 28.54£
34.16€ • 35.93$ • 28.54£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 18 decembrie 24 - 01 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781472574190
ISBN-10: 1472574192
Pagini: 264
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.39 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Seria Bloomsbury Ethics
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1472574192
Pagini: 264
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.39 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Seria Bloomsbury Ethics
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
Caracteristici
The current particularist/generalist debate is a highly technical and rather isolated debate inmetaethics. The book moves this debate forward into a wider, more practical context
Notă biografică
Maike Albertzart is Lecturer at the Institut für Philosophie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
Cuprins
Acknowledgements
Introduction
1. Moral Particularism
1.1 From scepticism about moral principles to particularism
1.2 The current particularism/generalism debate
1.3 The particularist challenge
2. Three Recent Attempts to Defend Moral Principles
2.1 Dancy's generalist critics
2.2 Moral principles and practical reasoning
3. The Nature and Roles of Moral Principles
3.1 Indeterminacy
3.2 Defeasibility
3.3 Moral principles and the activity of moral judgement
3.4 Moral principles and the capacity of moral judgement
Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
Introduction
1. Moral Particularism
1.1 From scepticism about moral principles to particularism
1.2 The current particularism/generalism debate
1.3 The particularist challenge
2. Three Recent Attempts to Defend Moral Principles
2.1 Dancy's generalist critics
2.2 Moral principles and practical reasoning
3. The Nature and Roles of Moral Principles
3.1 Indeterminacy
3.2 Defeasibility
3.3 Moral principles and the activity of moral judgement
3.4 Moral principles and the capacity of moral judgement
Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
Recenzii
Maike Albertzart's book can be read as an introduction to the ongoing dispute about what roles moral principles can and ought to play, but it also contains a substantial original contribution to this debate ... [Moral Principles] certainly opens up a space for new interesting ways to think about the perennial question of how to do normative moral philosophy.
This highly readable and engaging book deals, in a sophisticated and accessible manner, with a major point of contention in contemporary moral philosophy. Defending the import of moral principles, Maike Albertzart carefully comes to grips with the challenges posed by moral particularists. Students and advanced philosophers alike can profit from reflection on this book's arguments.
Moral Principles displays an uncommon but very welcome ability to bring a grounded moral understanding to bear on abstract questions in ethical theory. Albertzart provides much-needed structure and clarity to the increasingly unwieldy literature about the particularist challenge to the significance of moral principles. She articulates a promising conception of moral principles, one which sustains the pride of place of moral principles in ethical thought while at the same time capturing much of the appeal of particularism. This conception of principles is fruitful on its own as a contribution to meta-ethics, and it also has great potential to inform and illuminate work in normative ethics.
This highly readable and engaging book deals, in a sophisticated and accessible manner, with a major point of contention in contemporary moral philosophy. Defending the import of moral principles, Maike Albertzart carefully comes to grips with the challenges posed by moral particularists. Students and advanced philosophers alike can profit from reflection on this book's arguments.
Moral Principles displays an uncommon but very welcome ability to bring a grounded moral understanding to bear on abstract questions in ethical theory. Albertzart provides much-needed structure and clarity to the increasingly unwieldy literature about the particularist challenge to the significance of moral principles. She articulates a promising conception of moral principles, one which sustains the pride of place of moral principles in ethical thought while at the same time capturing much of the appeal of particularism. This conception of principles is fruitful on its own as a contribution to meta-ethics, and it also has great potential to inform and illuminate work in normative ethics.