Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Reconstructing Judicial Review

Autor Dr Sarah Nason
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 17 apr 2019
This book offers a new interpretation of judicial review in England and Wales as being concerned with the advancement of justice and good governance, as opposed to being concerned primarily with ultra vires or common law constitutionalism. It is developed both from examining the functions and values that ought to be served by judicial review, and from analysis of empirical 'social' facts about judicial review primarily as experienced in the Administrative Court. Based on ground-up case law analysis it constructs a new taxonomy on the grounds of judicial review: mistake, procedural impropriety, ordinary common law statutory interpretation, discretionary impropriety, relevant/irrelevant considerations, breach of an ECHR protected right or equality duty, and constitutional allocation of powers, constitutional rights, or other complex constitutional principles. It explains each of these grounds, what academic and judicial support there might be for them outside case law analysis, and their similarities and differences when viewed against popular existing taxonomies. It concludes that Administrative Court judges are engaged in ordinary common law statutory interpretation in approximately half of all cases, and that where discretionary judgement is involved on the part of the initial decision-maker, judges do indeed consider their task to be one of determining whether the challenged decision was justified by reasoning of adequate quality. It finds that judges apply ordinary common law principles of statutory interpretation with historical pedigrees, including assessing the initial decision-maker's reasoning with reference to statutory purpose, and sifting relevant from irrelevant considerations, including moral considerations. The result is a ground-breaking reassessment of the grounds of judicial review in England and Wales and the practice of the Administrative Court.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 23559 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 17 apr 2019 23559 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 53493 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 30 noi 2016 53493 lei  6-8 săpt.

Preț: 23559 lei

Preț vechi: 30578 lei
-23% Nou

Puncte Express: 353

Preț estimativ în valută:
4510 4849$ 3759£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 19 decembrie 24 - 02 ianuarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781509928828
ISBN-10: 1509928820
Pagini: 256
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 13 mm
Greutate: 0.37 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Caracteristici

Combines empirical, doctrinal and theoretical analysis to offer a comprehensive study of judicial review.

Notă biografică

Sarah Nason is Lecturer in Law at Bangor University.

Cuprins

1. Introduction: Reconstructing Judicial Review 2. The Dual Nature of Law and the Methodology of this Study: Constructive Interpretation 3. Judicial Review and Values 4. An Operative Interpretation of Judicial Review: Social Practice and the Administrative Court's Caseload 5. An Operative Interpretation of Judicial Review: Community Justice6. An Operative Taxonomy of Grounds of Review: Part One 7. An Operative Taxonomy of Grounds of Review: Part Two 8. A Target Interpretation of Judicial Review and Judicial Rationality 9. Judicial Review for the Advancement of Justice and Good Governance

Recenzii

Reconstructing Judicial Review makes a powerful argument for a constructive approach which synthesises empirical and conceptual analysis, laying moral values over social facts... this work succeeds in advancing a powerful holistic account of judicial review based on Dworkinian notions of constructivism and equal concern and respect.
The purpose of judicial review is the central concern of Sarah Nason's interesting study of judicial review in the United Kingdom ... all would surely admire her careful attention to the detail of theory and doctrine, as well as her carefully designed empirical methodology. These are drawn together in a cogent study that may provide a useful template for future such research throughout the common law world. More such studies of this breadth and quality can only be good.