Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation de Thomas Bustamante

Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation: Law and Philosophy Library, cartea 112

Editat de Thomas Bustamante, Christian Dahlman
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 20 apr 2015
This book provides theoretical tools for evaluating the soundness of arguments in the context of legal argumentation. It deals with a number of general argument types and their particular use in legal argumentation. It provides detailed analyses of argument from authority, argument ad hominem, argument from ignorance, slippery slope argument and other general argument types. Each of these argument types can be used to construct arguments that are sound as well as arguments that are unsound. To evaluate an argument correctly one must be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 58114 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Springer International Publishing – 5 oct 2016 58114 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 78448 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Springer International Publishing – 20 apr 2015 78448 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Law and Philosophy Library

Preț: 78448 lei

Preț vechi: 95668 lei
-18% Nou

Puncte Express: 1177
Preț estimativ în valută:
15015€ • 15616$ • 12583£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 13-27 martie

 Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9783319161471
ISBN-10: 3319161474
Pagini: 200
Ilustrații: XVI, 222 p. 6 illus., 1 illus. in color.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 x 20 mm
Greutate: 0.51 kg
Ediția:2015
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Springer
Seria Law and Philosophy Library

Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland

Public țintă

Research

Cuprins

Introduction.- about the authors.- I. Argument Types or Fallacies?.- 1. Appeal to Expert Testimony – A Bayesian Approach; Christian Dahlman and  Lena Wahlberg.- 2. Ad Hominem Fallacies and Epistemic Credibility; Audrey Yap.- 3. On the Absence of Evidence; Giovanni Tuzet.- 4. The Uses of Slippery Slope Argument; Jose Juan Moreso.- 5. Institutional constraints of topical strategic maneuvering in legal argumentation. The case of ‘insulting’;  Harm Kloosterhuis.- 6. One-Sided Argumentation in the Defense of Marriage Act; Janice Schuetz.- II. Argument Types and Legal Interpretation.- 7. Anti-Theoretical Claims about Legal Interpretation: The Argument behind the Fallacy; Thomas Bustamante.- 8. Frames of Interpretations and the Container-Retrieval View: Reflections on a Theoretical Contest;  Pierluigi Chiassoni.- 9. Argument Structures in Legal Interpretation: Balancing and Thresholds; Michał Araszkiewicz.- 10. An Analysis of some Juristic Techniques for Handling Systematic Defects in the Law; Giovanni Battista Ratti.- 11. Argumentation from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions;  Eveline Feteris.- 12. Legal Argumentation and Theories of Adjudication in the U.S. Legal Tradition: Between Cass Sunstein’s Minimalism, Richard Posner’s Pragmatism and Ronald Dworkin’s Advocacy of Integrity; Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes.- Index.

Textul de pe ultima copertă

This book provides theoretical tools for evaluating the soundness of arguments in the context of legal argumentation. It deals with a number of general argument types and their particular use in legal argumentation. It provides detailed analyses of argument from authority, argument ad hominem, argument from ignorance, slippery slope argument and other general argument types. Each of these argument types can be used to construct arguments that are sound as well as arguments that are unsound. To evaluate an argument correctly one must be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task.

Caracteristici

Offers useful tools that can be applied in the evaluation of legal arguments Includes important recent advances on various argument types and fallacies First book on various argument types and fallacies to focus on legal argumentation Includes contributions written by top international scholars in legal theory (Frederick Schauer, Pierluigi Chiassoni, Jose Juan Moreso, Giovanni Tuzet and others) Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras