Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives de Christian Dahlman

Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives: Law and Philosophy Library, cartea 102

Editat de Christian Dahlman, Eveline Feteris
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 12 sep 2012
This book offers its readers an overview of recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation written by representatives from various disciplines, including argumentation theory, philosophy of law, logic and artificial intelligence. It presents an overview of contributions representative of different academic and legal cultures, and different continents and countries. The book contains contributions on strategic maneuvering, argumentum ad absurdum, argumentum ad hominem, consequentialist argumentation, weighing and balancing, the relation between legal argumentation and truth, the distinction between the context of discovery and context of justification, and the role of constitutive and regulative rules in legal argumentation. It is based on a selection of papers that were presented in the special workshop on Legal Argumentation organized at the 25th IVR World Congress for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy held 15-20 August 2011 in Frankfurt, Germany. 
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 87288 lei  6-8 săpt.
  SPRINGER NETHERLANDS – 15 oct 2014 87288 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 87876 lei  6-8 săpt.
  SPRINGER NETHERLANDS – 12 sep 2012 87876 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Law and Philosophy Library

Preț: 87876 lei

Preț vechi: 107165 lei
-18% Nou

Puncte Express: 1318
Preț estimativ în valută:
16817€ • 17520$ • 13983£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 11-25 februarie 25

 Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9789400746695
ISBN-10: 9400746695
Pagini: 248
Ilustrații: XII, 236 p.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 x 20 mm
Greutate: 0.53 kg
Ediția:2013
Editura: SPRINGER NETHERLANDS
Colecția Springer
Seria Law and Philosophy Library

Locul publicării:Dordrecht, Netherlands

Public țintă

Research

Cuprins

Table of Contents.- Introduction; Christian Dahlman and Eveline Feteris.- Reasoning by Consequences: Applying Different Argumentation Structures to the Analysis of Consequentialist Reasoning in Judicial Decisions; Flavia Carbonell.- On the Argumentum ad Absurdum Statutory Interpretation: its Uses and Normative Significance; Thomas Bustamante.- Why precedent in law (and elsewhere) is not totally (or even substantially) about analogy; Frederick Schauer.- Fallacies in Ad Hominem Arguments; Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav and Lena Wahlberg.- The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion; Harm Kloosterhuis.- Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the “Unworthy Spouse”; Eveline Feteris.- Legal argumentation and the normativity of legal Norms; Carlos Bernal.- Weighing and Balancing in the Light of Deliberation and Expression; Bruce Anderson.- Construction or reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law; Jaap Hage.- The Argument from Psychological Typology for a Mild Separation between the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification; Marko Novak.- Constitutive Rules and Coherence in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Extensive and Restrictive Interpretation; Antonino Rotolo and Corrado Roversi.- Is Balancing a Method of Rational Justification sui generis?; Jan Sieckmann.- Arguing on Facts. Truth, Trials and Adversary Procedures.; Giovanni Tuzet.- Index.

Recenzii

From the book reviews:
“This collection of essays on legal argumentation theory should attract a broad audience of scholars from legal philosophy, argumentation, and logic. This book offers a broad range of theoretical essays that would be appropriate either as a textbook or for supplemental readings for an advanced level class on legal argumentation. … the volume should be useful and pertinent for theorists who study legal argumentation in those locations.” (Janice Schuetz, Journal of Argument in Context, Vol. 32 (2), 2014)

Textul de pe ultima copertă

This book offers its readers an overview of recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation written by representatives from various disciplines, including argumentation theory, philosophy of law, logic and artificial intelligence. It presents an overview of contributions representative of different academic and legal cultures, and different continents and countries. The book contains contributions on strategic maneuvering, argumentum ad absurdum, argumentum ad hominem, consequentialist argumentation, weighing and balancing, the relation between legal argumentation and truth, the distinction between the context of discovery and context of justification, and the role of constitutive and regulative rules in legal argumentation. It is based on a selection of papers that were presented in the special workshop on Legal Argumentation organized at the 25th IVR World Congress for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy held 15-20 August 2011 in Frankfurt, Germany.

Caracteristici

Provides access to recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation Offers a wide spectrum of the relevant topics and approaches, including reasoning by consequences, pluralism, proportionality, and process strategic maneuvering Presents representative contributions from disparate academic and legal cultures including Brazil, Canada, Chile, Slovenia, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, and the USA