Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Feminist Judgments: Family Law Opinions Rewritten: Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions

Editat de Rachel Rebouché
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 24 iun 2020
This book provides new, feminist perspectives on famous family law cases that span generations. The chapters take court decisions and rewrite them with feminist ideas in mind. Each rewritten opinion is penned by a leading scholar who relied only on materials available at the time of the original decision. The decisions address topics such as the criminalization of polygamy, intimate partner violence as a ground for asylum, the legality of gestational surrogacy, the rights of cohabitants, discrimination against transgender parents, immigration rules governing non-citizen parents, and child welfare and child support systems, among others. Each opinion is accompanied by a commentary that explains the original opinion as well as its contemporary relevance, and each commentary also is authored by a respected scholar. The combination of a rewritten opinion and its commentary provides an in-depth examination of the most important topics in family law.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 30297 lei  3-5 săpt.
  Cambridge University Press – 24 iun 2020 30297 lei  3-5 săpt.
Hardback (1) 77025 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Cambridge University Press – 24 iun 2020 77025 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions

Preț: 30297 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 454

Preț estimativ în valută:
5800 6029$ 4809£

Carte disponibilă

Livrare economică 16-30 ianuarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781108458337
ISBN-10: 1108458335
Pagini: 444
Dimensiuni: 151 x 227 x 23 mm
Greutate: 0.64 kg
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Seria Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions

Locul publicării:New York, United States

Cuprins

1. Introduction Rachel Rebouché; 2. Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) Marie Failinger and Laura Kessler; 3. McGuire v. McGuire, 59 N.W.2d 336 (Neb. 1953) Mary Anne Case, Martha Ertman and Zvi Triger; 4. Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970) Maya Manian and Susan Frelich Appleton; 5. Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972) Lisa Fishbayn Joffe and Kristen Murray; 6. Marvin v. Marvin, 557 P.2d 106 (Cal. 1976) Aníbal Rosario Lebrón and Kate Sablosky Elengold; 7. Kulko v. Superior Court, 436 U.S. 84 (1978) Mary-Beth Moylan and Katherine Macfarlane; 8. Daly v. Daly, 715 P.2d 56 (Nev. 1986) Raff Donelson and Nancy Polikoff; 9. Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989) Suzanne Kim and Albertina Antognini; 10. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989) Macarena Saez and Jessica Dixon Weaver; 11. Simeone v. Simeone, 581 A.2d 162 (Pa. 1990) Jamie Abrams and Alicia Kelly; 12. Borelli v. Brusseau, 12 Cal. App. 4th 647 (1993) June Carbone and Jo Carrillo; 13. Turner v. Rogers, 564 U.S. 431 (2011) Warren Binford and Elizabeth L. MacDowell; 14. In re T.J.S., 54 A.3d 263 (N.J. 2012) June Carbone and Seema Mohapatra; 15. Matter of A-B-, Respondent, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018) Natalie Nanasi and Suzan M. Pritchett; 16. Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 2017 WL 2507339 (U.S. 2017) Cynthia Godsoe and Tracy Thomas.

Descriere

Reimagined court opinions that address iconic issues in family law from a feminist perspective with timely commentaries on those issues.