Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Feminist Judgments: Reproductive Justice Rewritten: Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions

Editat de Kimberly M. Mutcherson
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 15 apr 2020
Reproductive justice (RJ) is a pivotal movement that supplants the language and limitations of reproductive rights. RJ's tenets are that women have the human rights to decide if or when they'll become pregnant, whether to carry a pregnancy to term, and to parent the children they have in safe and healthy environments. Recognizing the importance of the rights at stake when the law addresses parenting and procreation, the authors in this book re-imagine judicial opinions that address the law's treatment of pregnancy and parenting. The cases cover topics such as forced sterilization, pregnancy discrimination, criminal penalties for women who take illegal drugs while pregnant, and state funding for abortion. Though some of the re-imagined cases come to the same conclusions as the originals, each rewritten opinion analyzes how these cases impact the most vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities, poor women, and women of color.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 37188 lei  3-5 săpt.
  Cambridge University Press – 15 apr 2020 37188 lei  3-5 săpt.
Hardback (1) 76861 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Cambridge University Press – 15 apr 2020 76861 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions

Preț: 37188 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 558

Preț estimativ în valută:
7119 7400$ 5903£

Carte disponibilă

Livrare economică 16-30 ianuarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781108442350
ISBN-10: 1108442358
Pagini: 402
Dimensiuni: 152 x 227 x 21 mm
Greutate: 0.54 kg
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Seria Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions

Locul publicării:New York, United States

Cuprins

Part I. Introduction Kimberly Mutcherson; Part II: The Feminist Judgments; 1. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) Jasmine E. Harris and Kim Hai Pearson; 2. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942) Radhika Rao and Thomas Williams; 3. Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971) Michele Gilman and Priscilla Ocen; 4. Maher v. Roe, 432 US 464 (1977) Ederlina Co and Michele Goodwin; 5. In Re Madyun, 114 Daily wash. Law. Rptr. 2233 (D.C. Super Ct. 1986) Farah Diaz-Tello and Maya Manian; 6. Johnson v. Calvert, 5 Cal. 4th 84 (1993) Cathy Sakimura and Melanie Jacobs; 7. Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2000) Lisa Crooms-Robinson and Margo Kaplan; 8. State v. Oakley, 245 Wis. 2d 447 (2001) Aziza Ahmed and Solangel Maldonado; 9. Sojourner A. v. N.J. Dep't of Human Servs., 177 N.J. 318 Ann Cammett and Cynthia Soohoo; 10. K.M. v. E.G., 37 Cal. 4th 130 (2005) Nancy Polikoff and Melissa Murray; 11. Reber v. Reiss, 42 A.3d 1131 (2012) Kevin Maillard and Dara Purvis; 12. Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. – -, 133 S. Ct. 2552 (2013) Rose Cuison Villazor and Nancy Dowd; 13. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. __ (2014) Suzanne A. Kim and Anthony Michael Kreis; 14. Young v. UPS, 575 U.S. __ (2015) Mary Ziegler and Meredith Harbach; 15. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt Myrisha Lewis and David Cohen; Index.

Descriere

Reproductive justice theory made real through re-imagining critical cases addressing pregnancy, parenting, and the law's treatment of marginalized women.